Image via Wikipedia
One argument which was particularly tricky was what I'll call the 'natural' argument. In it's most basic form:
1. Some animals eat meat
2. Homo Sapiens evolved to eat meat
3. Acting as nature intended cannot be wrong
Conclusion: Eating meat cannot be wrong.
Perhaps I'll rebut the argument more fully in another post. Suffice it to say, digging into this gets tricky because it gets to the heart of what ethics is and how an ethical framework fits into the real world... heavy stuff.
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=025f3fb9-b661-4bfa-8837-00129a7dc46e)
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteask your sophist friends whether they know the difference between normative and positive statements ;-)
ReplyDeletegoing for a steak tonight, you?